This continuum helps people express their degree of accord with the proposed decision quickly and efficiently.
For the proposed decision, ask the participants where they stand along the gradient of agreement.
The SS-20s 5,000 kilometer range permitted it to cover targets in Western Europe, North Africa, the Middle East, and, from bases in the eastern Soviet Union, most of Asia, Southeast Asia, and Alaska.
In late 1977, NATOs Nuclear Planning Group ordered a study of the Alliances long-term INF modernization needs, consistent with the doctrine of flexible response.
In the mid-1970s the Soviet Union achieved rough strategic parity with the United States.
Shortly thereafter, the Soviet Union began replacing older intermediate-range SS-4 and SS-5 missiles with a new intermediate-range missile, the SS-20, bringing about what was perceived as a qualitative and quantitative change in the European security situation.
If you do adjust the proposed decision, repeat the polling.
(You do, however, need to and be explicit about who is the decision leader).
The bonus—it concurrently builds trust and transparency. You’ll get periodic tips for effective agile product discovery and delivery on topics like collaboration, discovering product requirements, facilitating analysis and planning valuing and slicing product needs, validating product decisions, and more.
Signed December 8, 1987Table of Contents Narrative Treaty Text Memorandum of Understanding Elimination Protocol Insections Protocol (with Annex)Corrigenda Agreed Minute Diplomatic Notes The Treaty Between the United States of America and the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics on the Elimination of Their Intermediate-Range and Shorter-Range Missiles, commonly referred to as the INF (Intermediate-Range Nuclear Forces) Treaty, requires destruction of the Parties' ground-launched ballistic and cruise missiles with ranges of between 500 and 5,500 kilometers, their launchers and associated support structures and support equipment within three years after the Treaty enters into force.
In retrospect, discussing the choice with the product owner, prior to making a decision, could have prevented an unfortunate and costly mistake.
The act of explicitly has a powerful effect on agile teams. It proactively incorporates seeking input and expertise to deliver the best product possible. Sign up here to join our growing product, business analysis and project community.